![]() ![]() The copies will be made from one partition on the same hard drive to another in all cases. The comparison will be a match between the standard Windows file copy and TeraCopy. I will try to duplicate my previous speed comparisons by first copying several thousand files, then copy a single large file. ![]() I will mention those a bit later, but for now, let’s simply talk speed. ![]() You may detect a note of skepticism from the onset, but I will try to be impartial, nevertheless.īefore we begin, I should make a point of telling you that there are definite advantages to using a third-party file copier/mover such as TeraCopy over the default Windows mechanisms. So, here I go again, delving into the myth of speedier file transfers. There has been a new release of TeraCopy in the interim and I have been told multiple times by commenters on that post that it is better and that another look is warranted. However, due to a number of requests, I will once again return to this topic. I still believe it to be a true statement. The above is a quote from an article I wrote a year ago about TeraCopy and I will not back-pedal. Granted, with some slick caching tricks, it may appear to be faster, but it is ultimately an illusion.” ![]() No software solution, no matter how sophisticated it may be, will increase those speeds. “I’ve always maintained, and still do, that no matter what the advertisements tell you, your file transfer speeds are limited by your hardware. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |